Lakeshore Laments - Latest Comments

Re: Your National Coverage on the Barrett-Obama Meeting

Treat — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:04:09 -0000

yeah but only one dem chair dates your sister.

Remeber your pal Bader said he had "The Best Dem Sources" of any conservative. How'd that work for him?

Barret is a Go, no matter how much the GOP hopes it's not so.

Re: Your National Coverage on the Barrett-Obama Meeting

kevinbinversie — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:34:48 -0000

Really, my source is a Dem County Chair in Wi. 72 to pick from...

Re: Your National Coverage on the Barrett-Obama Meeting

treat — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:25:31 -0000

looks like you are wrong when you ASSUME.

Barrett will be in when he feels the time is right.
He waited as long as possible to get in last time too.
Ditto for his Mayoral Run.

Sorry Mr. B.....it will be Governor Barrett no matter what your "Sources" and Charlie
sykes are telling you.

Re: CNN’s Rating Troubles Continue

treat — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:38:47 -0000

looks like fox is taking advantage of being the opposition network.
just like msnbc did in the bush years.
looks like the "haters" are more devoted than the "believers" in both cases!

seems to hold true from tuesdays elections, where there was no groudswell of new gop voters, just a lack of dems who bothered to show up.

Re: Favre and Rodgers…Together Again

candidcarrie — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:25:37 -0000

Seriously, these people should have asterisks after their names that say *not actually the athlete typically associated with this jersey.

#DressResponsibly

Re: WTAQ to Have Announcement on Bader Tomorrow

kneenor — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:48:19 -0000

I know Bill is out on the east coast and I'm sure he wouldn't want to come back to GB. But I'm sure if Bader is fired Bill will be smiling because it was shortly after Bader came to GB that Bill was gone and Jerry was on the air. I listen to him only because he's the only conservative "gig" in town, can't stand his radio style, he has a very annoying laugh, takes FOREVER to get to the subject he's discussing, and I think he's gotten too big for his britches, he's let his on air radio job go to his head. Don't know if you listen to him but earlier this year he got into a feud (in his mind only) with Mark Behling over some story Jerry broke and then Mark gave the details on his show a day or two later and didn't give credit to Bader. Bader was livid, went on air and in a round about way said he could do something to Behling's career. Bader was in Madison at the tea party rally April 15th and of all the speakers he was booring.
Lots of comments left on the Press Gazette story yesterday and there are some who think he was set up, suckered in by his "source". Only time will tell, I'm sure this will all come out in the end. I loved Beck yesterday and would welcome him every day.

Re: The More They Push Barrett, The Less This Makes Sense to Me

kevinbinversie — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:03:34 -0000

Corrected. Thanks for the spelling type. Cursed homonyms.

Re: NY-23 – Time for Liberal Bloggers to Get a New Meme

kevinbinversie — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:40:31 -0000

Il' tenant,

Comment 1) Please read this story. It comments on the changing dynamic on
the ground.:
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/64997-dems...

Comment 2) Like you, I want "the Whale" back.

Re: Dumbasses of the Week

Ann O'Nymous — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:40:04 -0000

Are you serious? The two "dumbasses of the week" are right here in the Fox Valley -- Jerry "Master" Bader and you!

You earned it for your sniveling defense of Jerry:

"I'm not going to deny thay Jerry made a huge career mistake, but I seriously believe he had the facts to back up his report when he posted it. This no doubt was a grave error on his part, but me as a friend who doesn't want to see it cost him his job."

If Jerry had any facts, he wouldn't have been run off the air!

Re: WTAQ to Have Announcement on Bader Tomorrow

maulreius — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:30:14 -0000

Bill LeMay is in the Carolinas I doubt he'll be brought back. LOL -- on a regular basis I get Blogger Beer visits based on Bill Lemay searches. I never much cared for him.

Re: WTAQ to Have Announcement on Bader Tomorrow

maulreius — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:28:34 -0000

Why would WTAQ lose its license over this? Isn't that the sort of banter that made Howard Stern rich?

Re: WTAQ to Have Announcement on Bader Tomorrow

skipper — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:40:15 -0000

Consider his firing a done deal.
Duke gets the chance to dump an aging vet for a younger, much cheaper,
option. kevin if your'e still looking you should apply.
option b is a syndicated show, again far cheaper!

Re: WTAQ to Have Announcement on Bader Tomorrow

kneenor — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:20:21 -0000

If he had the facts when he released the story, then why would he "retract" it. C'ome-on!!!! Grt real. Maybe now he'll be forced to find a real job rather than just sit there and wag his tongue. which obviously isn't connected to his brain. I vote to bring back Bill LuMaye.

Re: WTAQ to Have Announcement on Bader Tomorrow

Ann O'Nymous — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:02:06 -0000

Bader will be fired. He is a liability to the station, which could lose its license for his idiotic commentary. Good riddance to a complete asshole.

Re: The More They Push Barrett, The Less This Makes Sense to Me

Name — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:28:47 -0000

Reins, not reigns. There is a difference; get it right.

Re: That Would Be “Very” Personal Reasons

Stan from Cudahy — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:40:51 -0000

"Oh Lawton, yeah I knew about her. I think we all are shocked by the sexual harassment suit pending."

What did this comment mean, Kevin? Just because a slimy wingnut like Jerry Bader types sometthing doesn't make it true. This comment was apparently you confirming that you knew what Bader said to be true? Is that still your posture today?

Political discourse in this country has gone completely into the toilet. I wonder how Bader looks himself in the mirror. In addition to his smarmy verbal commentary, he posted a written defense of his "brilliant" commentary. Face it, the man is a complete and total asshole. Unfortunately, because of Times v. Sullivan, she can't sue him for libel. WTAQ must consider, however, whether or not it wants to keep a "walking lawsuit" on the payroll. For most employers, that would be a relatively easy decision.

Re: NY-23 – Time for Liberal Bloggers to Get a New Meme

illusory tenant — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:37:24 -0000

By the way, I now concede that "Brass Bonanza" is in fact the Greatest Ringtone Of All Times.

Re: NY-23 – Time for Liberal Bloggers to Get a New Meme

illusory tenant — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:33:56 -0000

You've got to be kidding.

"The poll of 300 likely voters ... margin of error is +/- 5.66%."

In other words, pure junk.

Re: That Would Be “Very” Personal Reasons

dad29 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:40:03 -0000

Heh. That means Pete Bock vs. Tom Barrett. They were about 3-4 years apart at Marquette High, but (obviously) hung in the same circles...

Re: Thought of the Day

Steve — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:40:41 -0000

Somehow it's The Liberal Bloggers Fault?
The Dems don't have a Candidate cause everyone is waiting for the guy with the easiest road to the Gov's Chair to decide whats best for his family and the state!
It's not like they'll have to settle for someone like T Wall,, D Westlake or some ex reality show star to be their great white male hope.
They've got tons of options, just waiting for the Barrett Decision.
Again how is this the liberal bloggers fault?

Re: Wood Finally Enters Rehab

capper — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:37:15 -0000

Wasn't he supposed to be in rehab when he picked up his most recent DUI?

He needs to be court-ordered into a locked detox facility first, IMHO.

Re: That Would Be “Very” Personal Reasons

steveegg — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:53:37 -0000

As predicted, the only mention of "family challenges" in this morning's Journal Sentinel crowi...er, story about forcing Babs ou...er, Lawton's unfortunate departure was an 18th-paragraph elaboration on the official "very personal reasons" by Sen. Jim Sullivan (D-Wauwatosa). They didn't even twig onto Peg Lautenschlager telling the Wisconsin State Journal that it was "family reasons".

Also from the Other WSJ, Kathleen Falk is part of the picture now. Somebody get the melted butter; I think the popcorn is ready.

Re: Welcome to the Beginning of the Double-Dip

maulreius — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:04:51 -0000

My Father, Brother, and myself just got very up and close signs that Citibank is in deep doo-doo. http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009...

Re: That Would Be “Very” Personal Reasons

swen — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:40:47 -0000

suit??
bader just says it brings sexual harassment issue up, as if it wasn't the lesbian problem that would doom her.

Re: Stupak: I Have Votes to Remove Abortion Funding

Name — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:16:32 -0000

Maybe we can convince the good Dr. to run for Gov, so we can get rid of him. He is arrogent enough to be tempted I bet.